Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water blanching produced the largest glucosinolate loss in broccoli, compared with steam blanching

A claim from GLUCOSINOLATE CHANGES IN BLANCHED BROCCOLI and BRUSSELS SPROUTS · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water blanching produced the largest glucosinolate loss in broccoli, compared with steam blanching

Treatment
Water blanchinge2
Outcome
glucosinolate losse2
Direction
most significante2
Comparator
steam blanchinge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Three major glucosinolates in broccoli, i.e., glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and glucobrassicin were greatly reduced by both water and steam blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147
e2

“Water blanching produced the most significant glucosinolate loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–213

Title

GLUCOSINOLATE CHANGES IN BLANCHED BROCCOLI and BRUSSELS SPROUTS

RENEÉ M. GOODRICH; JUDY L. ANDERSON; GILBERT S. STOEWSAND Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 1989. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.1989.tb00106.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d5d9de09cd8d85e368b929e9c0e5344ddbd84ab236893c52bd22bfb8cca13663 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.