Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bed planting gave significantly higher wheat grain yield, 40 8 q/ha, and was at par with conventional tillage.

A claim from Effect of tillage practices and cultivars on growth and biomass production of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting gave significantly higher wheat grain yield, 40 8 q/ha, and was at par with conventional tillage.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
40 8 q/hae0
Qualifier
37.3 q/hae0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher grain yield of wheat was recorded with bed planting (40 8 q/ha) which was at par with conventional method (37.3 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–619

Title

Effect of tillage practices and cultivars on growth and biomass production of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

Surender Singh Yadav; Shivnath Das; Sunil Kumar; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d70e84e8a3e32fee784fb8598cb8cd3140a1475b130b0eeab1d825b89fe48cde · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    No N application at tillering stage decreased spikes number per m2 and seeds per spike.

    Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. · 2011

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Grain yield under stress during tillering and jointing was 27% lower than under the nonstressed treatment I‐1.

    Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen and Irrigation · 1988 · compared with nonstressed (I‐1)

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    NT likely decreased wheat yield.

    The impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield in China depend on specific practices, crops and cropping regions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Tillage treatments had no residual effect on subsequent sunflower and wheat yields.

    Tillage and Residue Effects on Wheat, Sorghum, and Sunflower Grown in Rotation · 1984

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage system had no significant wheat yield effect from 1977 to 2016.

    Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Wheat grain yield was unaffected by tillage and cover crop management.

    Crop and cattle responses to tillage systems for integrated crop–livestock production in the Southern Piedmont, USA · 2007

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Reduced tillage decreased wheat yield by 14%.

    Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    RB had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.