Claim · model-written summary
PPO activity did not differ significantly between SA and ASA treatments in tomato leaves.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- SAe3
- Outcome
- PPO activitye3
- Direction
- no significant differencee3
- Comparator
- ASAe3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“With tomato seedling leaves,variety 'Gailiang America 908' and 'Hezuo 906' as material”
e3“PPO activity was no significant difference between SA and ASA tretments”
Title
Bai Su-hua Xibei zhiwu xuebao 2007
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation The suitable SA concentration for inducing tomato seedling leaves was 1 mmol/L.
- Observation The suitable ASA concentration for inducing tomato seedling leaves was 1.39 mmol/L.
- Intervention effect SA treatment was more effective than ASA in raising POD activity in tomato leaves.
- Intervention effect PPO activity of Hezuo 906 increased much more than that of Gailiang America 908 under the same treatment.
- Intervention effect POD activity of Gailiang America 908 increased much more than that of Hezuo 906 under SA and ASA treatment.
- Intervention effect SA and ASA sprays significantly increased PPO and POD activity in the leaves of both tomato varieties.