Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vermicompost and Spirulina extract significantly increased lettuce growth and yield relative to control.

A claim from The Role of Vermicompost and Foliar Spray of SpirulinaPlatensis Extract on Vegetative Growth, Yield and NutritionStatus of Lettuce Plant under sandy soil · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost and Spirulina extract significantly increased lettuce growth and yield relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
vermicompost fertilizer at rates of (1, 2 and 3 ton fed -1 ), and foliar spray of spirulina platensis extract (1and 2 gL -1 )e0
Outcome
growth characters, yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of vermicompost fertilizer at rates of (1, 2 and 3 ton fed -1 ), and foliar spray of spirulina platensis extract (1and 2 gL -1 ) within all tested treatments resulted had significant increases promoted growth characters, yieldand chemical composition (N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, and vitamin C) in leaves and roots as compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–677
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–130
t1

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–130

Title

The Role of Vermicompost and Foliar Spray of SpirulinaPlatensis Extract on Vegetative Growth, Yield and NutritionStatus of Lettuce Plant under sandy soil

A Yassen; Entsar Essa; Sahar Zaghloul; et al. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 2019. doi:10.22587/rjabs.2019.14.1.1

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-d7f97a79dd54e63257c8cca15310bf4c71e7319264b65bfddcf97331ee8a848d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

botanical · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

240 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.