Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low rate ZnO nanoparticles gave no or negligible grain Zn increase over water.

A claim from Biofortification of different maize cultivars with zinc, iron and selenium by foliar fertilizer applications · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rate ZnO nanoparticles gave no or negligible grain Zn increase over water.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZnO-NPse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
no increasee0
Qualifier
45.2 mg Zn L –1e0
Comparator
deionized watere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45
e0

“Applying ten-fold less Zn (at rate of 45.2 mg Zn L –1 ) plus urea in the form of ZnO-NPs, Zn-CNPs, or ZnSO 4 resulted in no increase, or a negligible increase, in grain Zn concentration compared with deionized water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–804

Title

Biofortification of different maize cultivars with zinc, iron and selenium by foliar fertilizer applications

Yan-Fang Xue; Xiao-Jing Li; Wei Yan; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1144514

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-d857df7a2db7ff2e5f987ddef9ab748519071ff943f0c54b91f7932b8e5f677b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.