Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined liquid NPK, Zn-solubilizing bacteria and RDF significantly influenced growth attributes.

A claim from Response of rainy-season groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) to varying fertility levels and bioformulations · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid NPK, Zn-solubilizing bacteria and RDF significantly influenced growth attributes.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
combined application of liquid NPK + Zn-solu- bilizing bacteria and RDFe0
Interactor
Zn-solu- bilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
growth at- tributese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth at- tributes, pod yield and net returns were significantly influenced with combined application of liquid NPK + Zn-solu- bilizing bacteria and RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1290
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–53

Title

Response of rainy-season groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) to varying fertility levels and bioformulations

NEELAM SINGH; EKTA JOSHI; D.S. SASODE; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v66i2.2846

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d8fcb199e84dd8fa5074d8375ded625ebf7845c038213f34f608fa62801185d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 102 positive, 17 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Liquid NPK bioformulation with Zn solubilizing bacteria gave better physiological growth of groundnut.

    Liquid Biofertilizer and Inorganic Nutrients Effect on Physiological, Quality Parameters and Productivity of Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Inoculation treatments had no effect on shoot and root dry matter at four weeks.

    Response tobradyrhizobiumstrain of peanut cultivars grown under iron stress · 1988

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Biofertilizer did not reduce salinity effects on peanut development.

    Growth and physiology of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) irrigated with saline water and biofertilizer application times · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Seed slurry inoculation reduced germination and stand establishment.

    Response Of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea) To Inoculation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Fusarium inoculation significantly reduced groundnut growth.

    Management of root rot disease of groundnut (Arachis hypogeae L.) by plant extracts · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Inoculant application did not increase peanut growth.

    Production of Peanut Intercropped with Forage Palm in Pernambuco State, Brazil · 2015

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    A single AMF inoculation had no effect on fresh weight, Ca and P of groundnut.

    Effect of Intercropping Between Corn (Zea mays) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AMF) on the Yield and Forage Mineral Content · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Inoculation with A. rolfsii significantly reduced shoot length in TAH-142 and TAH-124 compared with controls.

    Biochar soil application induces stress tolerance in Arachis hypogaea L. Varieties inoculated with stem rot fungus (Athelia rolfsii (Sacc.) C.C. Tu & Kim.) · 2025 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Liquid NPK bioformulation with Zn solubilizing bacteria gave better physiological growth of groundnut.

    Liquid Biofertilizer and Inorganic Nutrients Effect on Physiological, Quality Parameters and Productivity of Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Cow manure did not significantly affect the number of leaves of peanuts.

    Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, activity of nitrate reductase and chlorophyll contents of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Kelud volcanic ash and manure treatment did not significantly affect peanut height or stover dry weight.

    Ketersediaan dan Serapan Ca Pada Kacang Tanah di Tanah Alfisols yang Diberi Abu Vulkanik Kelud dan Pupuk Kandang · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Cow manure residue did not significantly affect peanut height at 15, 30, or 45 DAP or branches at 30 and 45 DAP.

    Effects of biochar residue and cow manure residue on entisol chemical properties, growth, and production of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in second planting season · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no effect on plant height, number of filled pods and plant stand of groundnut.

    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization for groundnut in saline soil · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Seedling root length tended to be lower with solution from the shared treatment.

    Biocompatibility of Sweetpotato and Peanut in a Hydroponic System · 1998

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Seed slurry inoculation reduced germination and stand establishment.

    Response Of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea) To Inoculation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Without boron in the fertilizer, peanut stems sometimes cracked and dark areas appeared at the internodes.

    Effect of Imbalance of Boron Nutrition on the Peanut1 · 1966 · compared with plants with boron in the fertilizer

    Opposite direction

195 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.