Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Furrow-ridge seedbed planting increased grain yield by 9.7% compared with the conventional flat uniform pattern.

A claim from Planting Pattern and Irrigation Effects on Water‐Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow-ridge seedbed planting increased grain yield by 9.7% compared with the conventional flat uniform pattern.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
furrow‐ridge seedbed planting patterne1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.7%e2
Comparator
conventional flat uniform planting patterne1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the production of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–353
e1

“Compared with the conventional flat uniform planting pattern, the new treatment of furrow‐ridge seedbed planting pattern increased WUE by 13.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1338
e2

“increased grain yield by 9.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1369

Title

Planting Pattern and Irrigation Effects on Water‐Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat

G.Y. Wang; Y.Y. Han; X.B. Zhou; et al. Crop Science 2014. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.06.0363

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d9d9d69f955fca13a13e2f6357b10eb3e9b6a7e53f3ec8914003e5096a79ab36 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.