Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased durum wheat yield by 0.13 t/ha after winter rye.

A claim from Effect of forecrop on yield of spring durum wheat and soil potassium in chernozems of southern steppe zone in Southern Urals during long-term research · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased durum wheat yield by 0.13 t/ha after winter rye.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
Treatment
use of mineral fertilizerse2
Outcome
yield increasee2
Direction
increasee2
Value
0.13 t/hae2
Qualifier
after winter ryee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The use of mineral fertilizers has a positive effect on yield of durum wheat; the yield increase was 0.10 t/ha after soil protecting fallow, 0.11 t/ha after common wheat and 0.13 t/ha after winter rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1161
t0

“Effect of forecrop on yield of spring durum wheat and soil potassium in chernozems of southern steppe zone in Southern Urals during long-term research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150

Title

Effect of forecrop on yield of spring durum wheat and soil potassium in chernozems of southern steppe zone in Southern Urals during long-term research

Vitaly Yu. Skorokhodov RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries 2021. doi:10.22363/2312-797x-2021-16-4-313-325

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-da6533fee3c79fc3c1e4ddf09ad29982008ba4c7d54c6ff6961bef9cc883a163 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.