Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More clay and organic matter improved root biomass under 16 g ha −1 indaziflam to at least 40% at 38 DAT.

A claim from Indaziflam Effect on Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.) Shoot Growth and Root Initiation as Influenced by Soil Texture and Organic Matter · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More clay and organic matter improved root biomass under 16 g ha −1 indaziflam to at least 40% at 38 DAT.

Taxon
BermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Increase in clay content and addition of OMe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
≥40%e0
Qualifier
16 g ha −1 indaziflame0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in clay content and addition of OM at 16 g ha −1 indaziflam significantly improved root biomass to ≥40% at 38 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1076
t0

“Bermudagrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–33

Title

Indaziflam Effect on Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.) Shoot Growth and Root Initiation as Influenced by Soil Texture and Organic Matter

Joseph G. Schneider; John B. Haguewood; Enzhan Song; et al. Crop Science 2014. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0155

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-da67622a42d76a35cd76b9647e81ad6d8d4cc0f9578848628920b6f5d14efb6e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · growth · Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.