Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The pruning protocol allowed vines to return quickly to earlier yield and quality levels without replanting.

A claim from Eradication of black rot ( Guignardia bidwellii ) from grapevines by drastic pruning · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning protocol allowed vines to return quickly to earlier yield and quality levels without replanting.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
drastic pruning strategye2
Outcome
yield and quality levelse0
Direction
return quicklye0
Comparator
previous yield and quality levelse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowing vines to return quickly to previous yield and quality levels without replanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1151
e1

“from grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–154
e2

“A drastic pruning strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26

Title

Eradication of black rot ( Guignardia bidwellii ) from grapevines by drastic pruning

M. R. Sosnowski; R. W. Emmett; W. F. Wilcox; et al. Plant Pathology 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02595.x

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-daabf7a3eade63d254f4595ffee13ee712ed36716e42851f704859774b0c3c94 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    In Semillon, postveraison leaf removal produced no differences in berry chemistry and sensory attributes.

    Postveraison Leaf Removal Does Not Consistently Delay Ripening in Semillon and Shiraz in a Hot Australian Climate · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    The higher-yielding 10-bud pruning did not negatively affect grape quality.

    Bud load management on table grape yield and quality – cv. Sugrathirteen (Midnight Beauty®) · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Pruning severity did not affect fruit composition.

    An Investigation of Training System, Pruning Severity, Spur Length, and Shoot Positioning on Cynthiana/Norton Grapes · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Root pruning of Seyval blanc at bloom and/or veraison for three years had little effect on yield components or juice composition.

    Root Pruning Has Little Effect on Seyval, Catawba or Concord Grapevines · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Girdling had little effect on berry quality.

    IMPROVEMENTS IN BERRY QUALITY OF RUBY SEEDLESS AND BEAUTY SEEDLESS GRAPES · 2008 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Continuous irrigation withholding after October pruning was unfavorable for grape quantity and quality.

    Effect of moisture stress and number of leaves on berry growth and quality of Tas-A-Ganesh grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock. · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Pre-flowering leaf removal had no overall impact on the quality of Doral and Gamay wines.

    Mechanisation of pre-flowering leaf removal under the temperate climate conditions of Switzerland · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    In 1988 shoot count, yield and quality were similar regardless of pruning severity (50, 70 or 90 nodes per vine).

    Yield and Quality of Vitis Hybrid `Suwannee' as Affected by Training System and Pruning Severity · 1991

    Opposite direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.