Paper · 2000 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of moisture stress and number of leaves on berry growth and quality of Tas-A-Ganesh grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock.

J. Satisha; S.D. Ramteke; S. D. Shikhamany

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Continuous withholding of irrigation after October pruning seems to be unfavorable for improving the quantity and quality of grapes grafted on rootstocks even with as many as 15 leaves on fruit-bearing shoots. Partial withholding of irrigation at different stages may improve quality of grapes and can also save the irrigation water. With normal irrigation and proper management practices even 10 leaves above the bunch on fruit-bearing shoots can improve the quality of grapes, minimizing the loss of water through transpiration by extra 5 leaves. Regarding the pattern of berry growth, it was same in all types of shoots. However, more number of leaves contribute to berry growth maximum upto 90 days after pruning and after varaison it was same in all types of shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous irrigation withholding after October pruning was unfavorable for grape quantity and quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Continuous withholding of irrigation after October pruninge0
Outcome
quantity and quality of grapese0
Direction
unfavorablee0
Qualifier
even with as many as 15 leaves on fruit-bearing shootse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous withholding of irrigation after October pruning seems to be unfavorable for improving the quantity and quality of grapes grafted on rootstocks even with as many as 15 leaves on fruit-bearing shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial irrigation withholding may improve grape quality and save water.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Partial withholding of irrigation at different stagese0
Outcome
quality of grapes and can also save the irrigation watere0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Partial withholding of irrigation at different stages may improve quality of grapes and can also save the irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten leaves above the bunch under normal irrigation can improve grape quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
10 leaves above the bunch on fruit-bearing shootse0
Outcome
quality of grapese0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
normal irrigation and proper management practicese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With normal irrigation and proper management practices even 10 leaves above the bunch on fruit-bearing shoots can improve the quality of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry growth pattern was the same across shoot types.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
pattern of berry growthe0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
all types of shootse0

Verbatim

e0

“the pattern of berry growth, it was same in all types of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More leaves increased berry growth until 90 days after pruning.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
more number of leavese0
Outcome
berry growthe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
upto 90 days after pruninge0

Verbatim

e0

“more number of leaves contribute to berry growth maximum upto 90 days after pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After veraison, berry growth was the same across shoot types.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
berry growthe1
Direction
samee0
Qualifier
after varaisone0
Comparator
all types of shootse0

Verbatim

e0

“after varaison it was same in all types of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“more number of leaves contribute to berry growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

23 papers: 5 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.