Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four-berry cutting in PVC had the highest acceptability.

A claim from Changes in phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut table grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar 'Shahaneh' as influence by fruit preparation methods and packagings. · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-berry cutting in PVC had the highest acceptability.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
4berries cutting, which packaged in PVC bagse0
Outcome
acceptabilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“4berries cutting, which packaged in PVC bags showed the lowest weight loss, decay incidence, berry shattering, with the highest acceptability as compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–436
t0

“grape (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–96

Title

Changes in phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut table grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar 'Shahaneh' as influence by fruit preparation methods and packagings.

Mohammad Ali Shiri; Mahmood Ghasemnezhad; Davood Bakhshi; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e0831f250596741a6634436820e37e454c8ad8c00854a9f9011d9e180ecf40be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

storage · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.