Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher planting density increased the numbers of tillers and effective spikes in the edge, second and central lines of wheat.

A claim from Lodging Resistance of Winter Wheat in Response to Nitrogen and Planting Density and Border Effect under Relay Intercropping Condition · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density increased the numbers of tillers and effective spikes in the edge, second and central lines of wheat.

Material
Chuanmai 42e0
Treatment
planting densitye2
Outcome
quantities of tillers and effective spikese2
Direction
enhancede2
Setting
Sichuan Provincee1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Chuanmai 42,the major wheat cultivar in local production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–479
e1

“a two-year field experiment was carried out in Sichuan Province from November 2009 to May 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–574
e2

“The quantities of tillers and effective spikes in edge, second, and central lines were all enhanced with the increase of planting density”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 925–1060

Title

Lodging Resistance of Winter Wheat in Response to Nitrogen and Planting Density and Border Effect under Relay Intercropping Condition

Fan Gao 2012

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-dabff7c4f7ece69aeed79221389fdcc1e35eadbf6b658fcc61627489e7969d8c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.