Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Total antioxidant content of soybean foliage did not differ significantly between ambient and elevated CO2 conditions.

A claim from Longevity and Fecundity of Japanese Beetle (Popillia japonica) on Foliage Grown Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total antioxidant content of soybean foliage did not differ significantly between ambient and elevated CO2 conditions.

Taxon
soybean (Glycine max)Glycine maxe2
Organ / stage
foliagee7
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e7
Outcome
total antioxidant contente7
Direction
No significant differencese7
Comparator
ambiente7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“consuming foliage of soybean (Glycine max) grown under elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–393
e7

“No significant differences in total antioxidant content of foliage from ambient and elevated CO(2) conditions were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1666

Title

Longevity and Fecundity of Japanese Beetle (Popillia japonica) on Foliage Grown Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide

Bridget F. O’Neill; Arthur R. Zangerl; Evan H. DeLucia; et al. Environmental Entomology 2008. doi:10.1603/0046-225x(2008)37[601:lafojb]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-db44fdf99ea3c501ceacc98f7dfd5e630e238e2d140bfeaee23a4b0c25daf98f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.