Claim · model-written summary
Under CK, ND yield was 12.25% higher than MD.
- Taxon
- Spring Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- NDe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.25%e0
- Comparator
- MDe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Spring Wheat”
e0“ND performed better under the CK treatment: its yield was 10,044.33 kg·ha−1, which was 27.07% and 12.25% higher than that of FD and MD, respectively”
Title
Responses of Yield, Efficiency, and Phenotypes of Spring Wheat in Arid Regions to Water Regulation
Na Li; Pinyuan Zhao; Jiaxin Zhu; et al. Agriculture 2025. doi:10.3390/agriculture15202174
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Under the same water treatment, LAI, SPAD value and stem diameter of spring wheat decreased significantly as irrigation amount was reduced.
- Intervention effect Plant height of spring wheat was less affected by the reduction in irrigation.
- Intervention effect Under W1, film-mulched drip irrigation (FD) yield reached 11,868.93 kg/ha, 54.88% higher than non-mulched drip irrigation (ND).
- Intervention effect Under W1, FD yield was 38.72% higher than non-mulched subsurface drip irrigation (MD).
- Intervention effect Under W1, FD water use efficiency reached 4.36 kg/m3, 123.19% higher than ND.
- Intervention effect Under W1, FD water use efficiency was 100.83% higher than MD.
- Intervention effect Under CK, ND yield reached 10,044.33 kg/ha, 27.07% higher than FD.
- Observation With 175 mm precipitation in 2023, ND showed an obvious advantage.
- Observation With precipitation down to 110 mm in 2024, FD exhibited stronger stress resistance.
- Recommendation FD is suitable for moderate to severe water stress, while ND is suitable for sufficient water or mild stress.