Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The two technologies improved plant height, leaf SPAD value and dry matter of rapeseed.

A claim from Optimum Water and Fertilizer Management for Better Growth and Resource Use Efficiency of Rapeseed in Rainy and Drought Seasons · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two technologies improved plant height, leaf SPAD value and dry matter of rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
The two technologies (SM + SR and RF + SR)e4
Outcome
height, leaf SPAD value and dry mattere4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“use efficiency of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–430
e4

“The two technologies (SM + SR and RF + SR) improved the height, leaf SPAD value and dry matter of the rapeseed and adjusted the root–shoot ratio under two different climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1254

Title

Optimum Water and Fertilizer Management for Better Growth and Resource Use Efficiency of Rapeseed in Rainy and Drought Seasons

Jun Feng; Hafiz Athar Hussain; Saddam Hussain; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12020703

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-dbcb98b90cb84b2acc85daae800978ebdd6dce8ea2d96a8469a89cca0b84195b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

rainfall · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

organic · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.