Claim · model-written summary
No tillage consistently recorded lower ERI.
Zea mays subsp. maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil temperature in the ST treatment compared favorably with CP, but showed an overall advantage over NT, which consistently recorded lower soil temperatures and ERI”
t0“Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation”
Title
David Kwaw‐Mensah Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 2005. doi:10.31274/rtd-20200723-46
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Tillage treatments did not significantly affect corn biomass.
- Intervention effect Tillage treatments did not significantly affect corn yield.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen application raised corn yield for both nitrogen sources.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen application raised corn stalk nitrate nitrogen concentration for both sources.
- Observation Corn showed luxury nitrogen consumption above 100 kg N ha−1 with both nitrogen sources.
- Intervention effect Strip tillage soil temperature compared favorably with chisel plow and exceeded no tillage.
- Intervention effect Soil moisture storage did not significantly differ among tillage treatments for either nitrogen source.
- Intervention effect Corn root water extraction did not significantly differ among tillage treatments or nitrogen sources.
- Intervention effect Soil penetration resistance did not significantly differ among tillage treatments.
- Association Soil penetration resistance rose with depth, especially in the top 20 cm and late season.