Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil moisture storage did not significantly differ among tillage treatments for either nitrogen source.

A claim from Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture storage did not significantly differ among tillage treatments for either nitrogen source.

Treatment
all tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil moisture storagee0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
top 30 cm and 0 to 120 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture storage for all tillage treatments at the top 30 cm and 0 to 120 cm were not significantly different for both N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1682
t0

“Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation

David Kwaw‐Mensah Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 2005. doi:10.31274/rtd-20200723-46

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cb7ecdde87dd43d816e6b266de0fe38328b64b34505b184ea289bf7c1c2b5e91 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.