Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil penetration resistance did not significantly differ among tillage treatments.

A claim from Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil penetration resistance did not significantly differ among tillage treatments.

Treatment
tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil penetration resistancee0
Direction
did not show significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil penetration resistance measurements for tillage treatments did not show significant differences but increased with soil depth especially in the top 20-cm soil depth and late in the growing season for both N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–2023
t0

“Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of tillage, nitrogen source and nitrogen rate on corn response and selective soil properties in a corn-soybean rotation

David Kwaw‐Mensah Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 2005. doi:10.31274/rtd-20200723-46

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-dec3a52d3caae1613299212b2ff1970c241e48feb2434b2fb408ae7ce5ad9df2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

tillage · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 33 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.