Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Proline foliar application significantly increased soybean yield and yield components over untreated plants, favoring 50 ppm.

A claim from Impact of Proline Foliar Spray on Yield and its Components of Some Soybean Genotypes Under Newly Reclaimed Soils · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline foliar application significantly increased soybean yield and yield components over untreated plants, favoring 50 ppm.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
foliar application of proline levelse0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
in favor of 50 ppm concentratione0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of proline levels caused a significant increase in the yield and its components as well as studied chemical traits of soybean genotypes compared to untreated plants in favor of 50 ppm concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–918

Title

Impact of Proline Foliar Spray on Yield and its Components of Some Soybean Genotypes Under Newly Reclaimed Soils

Ashraf El-Taib; Mostafa Abdein Bakheit; A.A. Omar; et al. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.21608/ajas.2022.113712.1081

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dcdf41f20767f27711b7ea29a36f440481233ade83a929e30698de892fd8258f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

proline · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.