Claim · model-written summary
Maleic hydrazide MH-30 was ineffective against chlorophyll and solanine formation.
- Taxon
- POTATO
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll and solanine formatione0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30 and Cyocel® were ineffective in controlling both chlorophyll and solanine formation”
Title
METABOLISM OF SOLANINE AND CHLOROPHYLL IN POTATO TUBERS AS AFFECTED BY LIGHT AND SPECIFIC CHEMICALS
B. C. PATIL; O. K. SALUNKHE; B SINGH Journal of Food Science 1971. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb06391.x
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Bounty, Kennebec, Norchip and Red Lasoda tubers were most sensitive to greening and solanine development under the stated light exposure.
- Observation LaChipper and Platte tubers resisted light effects.
- Association Chlorophyll synthesis was inversely associated with tuber specific gravity.
- Association Tuber specific gravity did not affect solanine synthesis.
- Intervention effect Tuber chlorophyll content at 50 and 200 ft-c was lower than at 100 and 150 ft-c.
- Intervention effect The studied light intensities did not influence solanine synthesis.
- Intervention effect Ethrel inhibited chlorophyll formation and was more effective at it.
- Intervention effect Ethrel inhibited solanine formation.
- Intervention effect Alar inhibited chlorophyll formation.
- Intervention effect Alar was most effective at preventing solanine formation.
- Intervention effect Cyocel was ineffective against chlorophyll and solanine formation.