Abstract
SUMMARY— Chlorophyll and solanine syntheses as affected by cultivars, specific gravities, light intensities, and chemicals were studied in potato (Solanum tuberosum, L.) tubers. When exposed to 100 ft‐c of while fluorescent light for 5 days, tubers of Bounty, Kennebec, Norchip and Red Lasoda were most sensitive to greening and solanine development. LaChipper and Platte tubers were resistant to the light effects. Chlorophyll synthesis was inversely related to specific gravity of tubers, while specific gravity did not affect solanine synthesis. The chlorophyll content of tubers exposed to 50 ft‐c and 200 ft‐c was significantly less than that of tubers exposed to 100 ft‐c and 150 ft‐c light intensities. The solanine synthesis was not influenced by the light intensities studied. Chemicals were applied at a concentration of 10,000 ppm by vacuum injection technique. Ethrel® and Alar® were effective in inhibiting chlorophyll and solanine formation. Ethrel was more effective in retarding the chlorophyll formation and alar was most effective in preventing solanine formation. Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30 and Cyocel® were ineffective in controlling both chlorophyll and solanine formation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Bounty, Kennebec, Norchip and Red Lasoda tubers were most sensitive to greening and solanine development under the stated light exposure.
- Taxon
- POTATO
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Material
- Bounty, Kennebec, Norchip and Red Lasodae0
- Treatment
- 100 ft‐c of while fluorescent light for 5 dayse0
- Outcome
- greening and solanine developmente0
- Direction
- most sensitivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“When exposed to 100 ft‐c of while fluorescent light for 5 days, tubers of Bounty, Kennebec, Norchip and Red Lasoda were most sensitive to greening and solanine development”
Claim · model-written summary
LaChipper and Platte tubers resisted light effects.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Material
- LaChipper and Plattee0
- Outcome
- resistant to the light effectse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“LaChipper and Platte tubers were resistant to the light effects”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll synthesis was inversely associated with tuber specific gravity.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Organ / stage
- tuberse0
- Outcome
- Chlorophyll synthesise0
- Direction
- inversely relatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Chlorophyll synthesis was inversely related to specific gravity of tubers”
Claim · model-written summary
Tuber specific gravity did not affect solanine synthesis.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Organ / stage
- TUBERSt0
- Outcome
- solanine synthesise0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“specific gravity did not affect solanine synthesis”
Claim · model-written summary
Tuber chlorophyll content at 50 and 200 ft-c was lower than at 100 and 150 ft-c.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 50 ft‐c and 200 ft‐ce0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Comparator
- 100 ft‐c and 150 ft‐c light intensitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“The chlorophyll content of tubers exposed to 50 ft‐c and 200 ft‐c was significantly less than that of tubers exposed to 100 ft‐c and 150 ft‐c light intensities”
Claim · model-written summary
The studied light intensities did not influence solanine synthesis.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- light intensities studiede0
- Outcome
- solanine synthesise0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“The solanine synthesis was not influenced by the light intensities studied”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel inhibited chlorophyll formation and was more effective at it.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Ethrele1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll formatione1
- Direction
- retardinge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Ethrel® and Alar® were effective in inhibiting chlorophyll and solanine formation”
e1“Ethrel was more effective in retarding the chlorophyll formation”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel inhibited solanine formation.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Ethrel®e0
- Outcome
- solanine formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Ethrel® and Alar® were effective in inhibiting chlorophyll and solanine formation”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar inhibited chlorophyll formation.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Alar®e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll formatione1
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Ethrel® and Alar® were effective in inhibiting chlorophyll and solanine formation”
e1“Ethrel was more effective in retarding the chlorophyll formation”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar was most effective at preventing solanine formation.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- alare0
- Outcome
- solanine formatione0
- Direction
- preventinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“alar was most effective in preventing solanine formation”
Claim · model-written summary
Maleic hydrazide MH-30 was ineffective against chlorophyll and solanine formation.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll and solanine formatione0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30 and Cyocel® were ineffective in controlling both chlorophyll and solanine formation”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyocel was ineffective against chlorophyll and solanine formation.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Cyocel®e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll and solanine formatione0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
e0“Maleic hydrazide MH®‐30 and Cyocel® were ineffective in controlling both chlorophyll and solanine formation”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
light · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.