Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Net economic return was highest at high plant density (D3) with compost + sulfur.

A claim from Effect of Maize Plant Density, Compost and Sulfur on Productivity of Intercropped Maize and Tomato and some Soil Properties · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net economic return was highest at high plant density (D3) with compost + sulfur.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
high plant density (D3) with compost + sulfure3
Outcome
Net economic returne3
Direction
highest valuese3
Setting
Experimental Farm, EL- Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm, EL- Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, El-Gharbia Governorate, ARC, during the two seasons 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174
e2

“The results revealed that the maximum values of the all traits of maize and tomato were obtained when high plant density (D3) with compost + sulfur in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–975
e3

“The high plant density (D3) with compost + sulfur gave the highest values of water use efficiency, LER, ATER, LEC, MAI and Net economic return in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1538

Title

Effect of Maize Plant Density, Compost and Sulfur on Productivity of Intercropped Maize and Tomato and some Soil Properties

Y. A. M. Abd-Allah; A. M. M. Sheha; H. M. M. Elshahed Journal of Plant Production 2021. doi:10.21608/jpp.2021.160667

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-df5d84e220d52ac9f0d6dc4c4c4142db944b76485389d06e77e8b4010db27d3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

649 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.