Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combination produced the highest marketable yield in 2023, 39.67 t ha −1.

A claim from Evaluation of the Impact of Combined Application of Inorganic Fertilizer and Plant Spacing on Onion ( Allium cepa L.) Production Under Irrigation Conditions in Central Ethiopia, Ethiopia · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced the highest marketable yield in 2023, 39.67 t ha −1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
244 kg·ha −1 NPSB fertilizer and 7.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.67 t ha −1e0
Qualifier
2023e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal combination of 244 kg·ha −1 NPSB fertilizer and 7.5 cm spacing produced the highest marketable yields—41.2 t ha −1 in 2022 and 39.67 t ha −1 in 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–853
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 94–99

Title

Evaluation of the Impact of Combined Application of Inorganic Fertilizer and Plant Spacing on Onion ( Allium cepa L.) Production Under Irrigation Conditions in Central Ethiopia, Ethiopia

Adane Fentaye Belay; Yekite Terefe Zewdie; Zenebe Woldu International Journal of Agronomy 2025. doi:10.1155/ioa/3714995

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e02bc680aba074b39bd8ac873897f293c90af5b681033f94bebc1708953d9ba9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.