Claim · model-written summary
There was no difference in grain yield between PSB + TSP and AMF + TSP under any iron treatment.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- AMF + TSPe3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- no differencee3
- Comparator
- PSB + TSPe3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“phosphorus on wheat growth and nutrient uptake in alkaline soil”
e3“There was no difference in grain yield between PSB + TSP and AMF + TSP for any of the iron treatments”
Title
Amirhassan Fiuzi; Mojtaba Hassanzadehdelouei; Ahad Madani Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2374279
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Foliar iron with AMF + TSP increased seed potassium by 16.3-17.9% compared with PSB + TSP.
- Intervention effect Foliar iron with AMF + TSP increased root length density by 22.1-25.8% compared with PSB + TSP.
- Intervention effect Under soil-applied iron, AMF + TSP lowered seed magnesium by 28.5-29.1% compared with PSB + TSP.
- Intervention effect Under soil-applied iron, AMF + TSP raised seed zinc concentration by 23.9-28.4% compared with PSB + TSP.
- Intervention effect AMF + TSP raised soluble protein levels compared with PSB + TSP.
- Intervention effect AMF + TSP lowered chlorophyll concentration compared with PSB + TSP under soil-applied iron.
- Intervention effect Combining AMF + TSP with foliar iron gave the highest grain yield.
- Intervention effect Combining AMF + TSP with foliar iron gave desirable seed nutrient content, particularly zinc, iron and magnesium.
- Intervention effect Combining AMF + TSP with foliar iron improved root biomass, chlorophyll and soluble proteins compared with PSB + TSP and TSP alone.