Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Minimum tillage with crop residue cover increased water productivity by 27.5% over conventional tillage.

A claim from Effect of tillage practices and crop diversification on productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max)-based cropping systems · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage with crop residue cover increased water productivity by 27.5% over conventional tillage.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max)Zea mayst0
Treatment
MT with crop residue covere5
Outcome
water productivitye6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
27.5 %e6
Comparator
CTe6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max)-based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–172
e5

“MT with crop residue cover recorded 12.7% increase in production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1614
e6

“27.5 % in water productivity (3.06 and 2.40 kg/m3 , average of 2 years under minimum and conventional tillage) over CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1824

Title

Effect of tillage practices and crop diversification on productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max)-based cropping systems

DASHARATH PRASAD; D.S. RANA; K.S. RANA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i4.4593

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e058289ad83ff6c7e59b1206eb8d936f1174bf84847eda097dbdccb61f45f81d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

organic · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 75 positive, 8 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.