Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed length was highest with T5 (1.84 cm) and next highest with T6 (1.76 cm).

A claim from Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed length was highest with T5 (1.84 cm) and next highest with T6 (1.76 cm).

Taxon
French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25%Vermicompost+Bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium+PSB)e2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe2symbiont
Outcome
seed lengthe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.84 cme1
Comparator
T6e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–88
e1

“seed length was highest in T5 (1.84 cm) followed by T6 (1.76 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–842
e2

“T5 [75% RDF + 25%Vermicompost+Bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium+PSB)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–327

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Sayma Parween International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.287

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e09d38caf0112ae91a152030916165b1861cb245dad51d8a83afd7804a9f8f83 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Rhizobium inoculation alone gave lower seed production than the lowest nitrogen treatment.

    Effects of Nitrogen application on snap beans production in Koibatek district Kenya · 2014 · compared with treatment with least nitrogen

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation affected common bean yield as reported.

    Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments · 2025

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Inoculation with Rhizobium plus 40 kg N ha-1 at 25 DAE (I+N) gave the same crop yield as plants fertilized at sowing and at 25 DAE (F).

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF COMMON BEAN AS AFFECTED BY SEED INOCULATION WITH RHIZOBIUM AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION · 2016 · compared with plants fertilized at sowing and at 25 DAE (F)

    No difference from an alternative

  4. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation with P addition did not increase seed yield beyond P alone.

    Environmental constraints to nodulation and nitrogen fixation ofPhaseolus vulgaris l. in Tanzania. II. Response to N and P fertilizersand inoculation with Rhizobium · 1998 · compared with P alone

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Triple inoculation increased seed yield by 6.6% over control.

    EFFECTS OF SINGLE, DUAL AND TRIPLE INOCULATIONS WITHBACILLUS SUBTILIS,BACILLUS MEGATERIUMANDRHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM BV. PHASEOLION NODULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE, YIELD AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARISL. CV. ‘ELKOCA-05’) · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Rhizobium HB-429 inoculation increased grain yield by 48% versus uninoculated controls.

    Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia · 2017 · compared with uninoculated control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and PGPR inoculation significantly increased bean yield and yield components.

    Evaluation of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Seeds Inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoli and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Yield and Yield Components · 2008

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Rhizobium inoculation significantly improved common bean yield.

    Indigenous rhizobia population influences the effectiveness of Rhizobium inoculation and need of inorganic N for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in eastern Ethiopia · 2015

    Same direction

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculation had no effect on yield.

    Field Trials with Canadian Wonder Beans in Malawi · 1973

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation produced no bean yield response at either site.

    Nitrogen application and inoculation with Rhizobium tropici on common bean in the fall/winter · 2014

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The fertilizer combination significantly increased plant height, branches, leaf area and plant dry weight in Arkasuvidha.

    Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) · 2011

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Standard fertilizer did not increase bean production.

    Associational Susceptibility: Effects of Cropping Pattern and Fertilizer on Malawian Bean Fly Levels · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Dry bean grain yield at the optimum and adjusted low fertilizer rates was comparable in 2007/08.

    Assessment of maize and dry bean productivity under different intercrop systems and fertilization regimes. · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Heavy nitrogen fertilization did not increase seed yield.

    Partitioning of nitrogen from biological fixation and fertilizer in Phaseolus vulgaris · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    PBZ ten days after ammonium sulfate fertilization did not affect bean yield.

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF THE COMMON BEAN IN RESPONSE TO COMBINED APPLICATION OF NITROGEN AND PACLOBUTRAZOL · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization at any timing did not increase yield components or grain yield.

    Nitrogen management effects on soil mineral nitrogen, plant nutrition and yield of super early cycle common bean genotypes · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Organic nutrient management reduced french bean yield by 29.5–46.2% relative to integrated nutrient management.

    Effects of Organic Amendments on Productivity and Profitability of Bell Pepper–French Bean–Garden Pea System and on Soil Properties during Transition to Organic Production · 2011 · compared with integrated nutrient management

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Improved fertilization did not have a significant effect on bean yield.

    Factors contributing to maize and bean yield gaps in Central America vary with site and agroecological conditions · 2019

    Opposite direction

367 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.