Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Indigenous Rhizobium isolates CHB 1120 and CHB 1121 increased shoot and root dry weight of white clover compared with the non-inoculated control and BCRC 14266 at 75 DAP.

A claim from Nitrogen uptake and growth of white clover inoculated with indigenous and exoticRhizobiumstrains · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous Rhizobium isolates CHB 1120 and CHB 1121 increased shoot and root dry weight of white clover compared with the non-inoculated control and BCRC 14266 at 75 DAP.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense3
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse2
Treatment
inoculated respectively with two indigenous isolatese3
Interactor
CHB 1120 and CHB 1121e2symbiont
Outcome
dry weight of shoots and rootse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
non-inoculated control and BCRC 14266e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Compared with the non-inoculated control and BCRC 14266, CHB 1120 and CHB 1121 significantly increased the dry weight of shoots and roots at 75 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–992
e3

“white clover plants were inoculated respectively with two indigenous isolates (CHB 1120 and CHB 1121), BCRC 14266, and a non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–723

Title

Nitrogen uptake and growth of white clover inoculated with indigenous and exoticRhizobiumstrains

Dumsane Themba Matse; Cheng-Hua Huang; Yuh-Ming Huang; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758134

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e0db982d934a5ea50d9d8340e947ea56081d792d92242eccbe3d4321481c8804 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.