Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofeedback irrigation increased pea biomass by 30%.

A claim from Biofeedback-Based Closed-Loop Phytoactuation in Vertical Farming and Controlled-Environment Agriculture · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofeedback irrigation increased pea biomass by 30%.

Treatment
biofeedback-based irrigatione0
Outcome
pea biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in combination with biofeedback-based irrigation, a 30% increase in pea biomass was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1414

Title

Biofeedback-Based Closed-Loop Phytoactuation in Vertical Farming and Controlled-Environment Agriculture

Serge Kernbach Biomimetics 2024. doi:10.3390/biomimetics9100640

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e126dc54166d7cc7f7f2b29ced903042bf5d009a7261737d247e03e4607dc0fc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
    Irrigation at 140% IR reduced spring pea germination by 5% to 13%.

    Irrigation Management Effects on Spring Pea Seed Yield and Quality · 1987 · compared with 100% of the estimated optimal irrigation amount (IR)

    Opposite direction

  8. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.