Paper · 2018 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

COMBINED APPLICATION OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAE FUNGI AND PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING BACTERIA IMPROVES GROWTH AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE EFFICIENCY OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) PLANTS

Eriola Veselaj; Glenda Sallaku; Astrit Balliu

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of commercially available AMF inoculate (a mixture of Rhizophagus intraradices, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Funneliformis mossea, Funneliformis geosporum, Rhizophagus clarus) and plant growth promoting bacteria (Rhizobium leguminosarum and Burkholderia sp.), either supplied individually or in combination with each other, on growth, root morphology and nutrient uptake capabilities in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Inoculated and non-inoculated pea plants were subjected to three levels of salinity (0, 20 and 50 mM) by the addition of sodium chloride into tap water. Morphology of root system was analyzed and dry matter of roots and shoots were individually measured several times during the growing cycle in randomly selected plants. The dry matter of roots and shoots was mixed together and concentration of N, P, K and Na was analytically determined. The raise of salinity in the irrigation water has strongly diminished the growth of pea plants by significantly reducing the weight, length, and surface area of root system, and deteriorating its nutrient capabilities. The inoculation of either AM fungi or PGPB in the growing substrate has contributed to alleviating the salinity stress effects through promoting growth and enhancing nutrient uptake capabilities of the root system. The combined application of AM fungi and PGPB could further enhance the nutrient uptake capabilities of pea plants under adverse salinity conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity significantly reduced pea root weight, length, and surface area.

Taxon
pea plantsLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
salinity in the irrigation watere0
Outcome
weight, length, and surface area of root systeme0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The raise of salinity in the irrigation water has strongly diminished the growth of pea plants by significantly reducing the weight, length, and surface area of root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity impaired pea root nutrient capabilities.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
nutrient capabilitiese0
Direction
deterioratinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deteriorating its nutrient capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“three levels of salinity (0, 20 and 50 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA (Pisum sativum L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungal inoculation alleviated salinity stress through greater pea growth and root nutrient uptake.

Treatment
inoculation of either AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
growth and enhancing nutrient uptake capabilities of the root systeme0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of either AM fungi or PGPB in the growing substrate has contributed to alleviating the salinity stress effects through promoting growth and enhancing nutrient uptake capabilities of the root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA (Pisum sativum L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB inoculation alleviated salinity stress through greater pea growth and root nutrient uptake.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and enhancing nutrient uptake capabilities of the root systeme0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of either AM fungi or PGPB in the growing substrate has contributed to alleviating the salinity stress effects through promoting growth and enhancing nutrient uptake capabilities of the root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA (Pisum sativum L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AM fungal and PGPB application could further enhance pea nutrient uptake under salinity.

Taxon
pea plantsLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
combined application of AM fungi and PGPBe0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPBe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptake capabilitiese0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of AM fungi and PGPB could further enhance the nutrient uptake capabilities of pea plants under adverse salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1489 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 1 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

salinity · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 3 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Samrina Zard retained 14.54% shoot length at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

    EVALUATION OF PEA GENOTYPES FOR SALT STRESS TOLERANCE · 2023 · compared with the control and all other treatments

    Opposite direction

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.