Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AM fungi increased relative leaf water content in pea by 3% versus non-AM fungi counterparts.

A claim from Influence of AM fungi, inorganic phosphorus and irrigation regimes on plant water relations and soil physical properties in okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L.) – pea ( Pisum sativum L.) cropping system in Himalayan acid alfisol · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased relative leaf water content in pea by 3% versus non-AM fungi counterparts.

Treatment
AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
relative leaf water contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
3%e0
Comparator
non-AM fungi counterpartse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated use of AM fungi at varying phosphorus (P) levels and irrigation regimes led to significantly higher relative leaf water content (3% each) in okra and pea besides significantly higher xylem water potential (27%) in pea over non-AM fungi counterparts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–770

Title

Influence of AM fungi, inorganic phosphorus and irrigation regimes on plant water relations and soil physical properties in okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L.) – pea ( Pisum sativum L.) cropping system in Himalayan acid alfisol

Anil Kumar; Anil Kumar Choudhary; V. K. Suri Journal of Plant Nutrition 2015. doi:10.1080/01904167.2015.1087030

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-8f4e78aa7e6e8a026e3251d733805742ca185d45f9a9cfbcf80194e88a971a9c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.