Abstract
The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Giomus mosseae, G. monosporum and Gigaspora margarita) to suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf was assessed by comparing the growth parameters of plants infested with F. sofam‘ in the presence or absence of a systemic fungicide application. At plant vegetative, flowering and maturity stages. F. sofanf significantly reduced shoot and dry weights, pod numbers and seed weight of pea plants at all stages of plant growth. in contrast, the growth response and biomass of pea plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi was significantly higher than that of non- mycorrhizal plants both in the presence or absence of the pathogen or fungicide. in this connection, AM fungi led to enhancing and increase the content of phosphorus, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll, a, b and carotenoids), total nitrogen, phenol and proline contents in the pea plants compared with non-mycorrhizal pea plants. The results suggested that AM fungi is a potentially effective protection agents against F. sofani.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium infestation significantly reduced pea shoot and dry weights
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- infested with F. sofam‘e1
- Interactor
- F. sofanfe2pathogen
- Outcome
- shoot and dry weightse2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e1“infested with F. sofam‘ in the presence or absence of a systemic fungicide application”
e2“F. sofanf significantly reduced shoot and dry weights, pod numbers and seed weight of pea plants at all stages of plant growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium infestation significantly reduced pea pod numbers and seed weight
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- infested with F. sofam‘e1
- Interactor
- F. sofanfe2pathogen
- Outcome
- pod numbers and seed weighte2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e1“infested with F. sofam‘ in the presence or absence of a systemic fungicide application”
e2“F. sofanf significantly reduced shoot and dry weights, pod numbers and seed weight of pea plants at all stages of plant growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi had a significantly higher growth response and biomass than non-mycorrhizal plants
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- inoculated with mycorrhizal fungie3
- Interactor
- mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
- Outcome
- growth response and biomasse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- non- mycorrhizal plantse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e3“the growth response and biomass of pea plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi was significantly higher than that of non- mycorrhizal plants both in the presence or absence of the pathogen or fungicide”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi increased phosphorus content in pea compared with non-mycorrhizal plants
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- AM fungie4
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
- Outcome
- content of phosphoruse4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal pea plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e4“AM fungi led to enhancing and increase the content of phosphorus, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll, a, b and carotenoids), total nitrogen, phenol and proline contents in the pea plants compared with non-mycorrhizal pea plants”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi increased photosynthetic pigment content in pea compared with non-mycorrhizal plants
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- AM fungie4
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
- Outcome
- photosynthetic pigmentse4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal pea plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e4“AM fungi led to enhancing and increase the content of phosphorus, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll, a, b and carotenoids), total nitrogen, phenol and proline contents in the pea plants compared with non-mycorrhizal pea plants”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi increased total nitrogen in pea compared with non-mycorrhizal plants
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- AM fungie4
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
- Outcome
- total nitrogene4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal pea plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e4“AM fungi led to enhancing and increase the content of phosphorus, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll, a, b and carotenoids), total nitrogen, phenol and proline contents in the pea plants compared with non-mycorrhizal pea plants”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi increased phenol and proline contents in pea compared with non-mycorrhizal plants
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- AM fungie4
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
- Outcome
- phenol and proline contentse4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal pea plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e4“AM fungi led to enhancing and increase the content of phosphorus, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll, a, b and carotenoids), total nitrogen, phenol and proline contents in the pea plants compared with non-mycorrhizal pea plants”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi may be an effective protection agent against Fusarium in pea
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Interactor
- F. sofanie5pathogen
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- protection agentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppress root rot disease in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Fusarium sofanf”
e5“The results suggested that AM fungi is a potentially effective protection agents against F. sofani”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →infection · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →infection · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.