Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PCU improved root length compared with LFP.

A claim from One-Time Application of Polymer-Coated Urea Increased Rice Yield and Plant Nitrogen Uptake by Optimizing Root Morphological and Physiological Traits · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU improved root length compared with LFP.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
LFPe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to LFP, PCU significantly improved several root morphological traits, including increased deep-root proportion and specific root length (SRL), throughout the entire growth period; increased root length and root length density at heading and maturity; and increased root biomass growth rate from jointing to heading and reduced reduction rate after heading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1744
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58

Title

One-Time Application of Polymer-Coated Urea Increased Rice Yield and Plant Nitrogen Uptake by Optimizing Root Morphological and Physiological Traits

Junlin Zhu; Song Chen; Chunmei Xu; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15020282

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e128df183aa757c6d09553cb6506eca1140be0bc1615868ecb0627c942b5048a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this claim · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.