Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The named zinc spray schedule increased effective tillers, grain weight and yield over other treatments.

A claim from Phenophase-based nitrogen and zinc scheduling for agronomic zinc biofortification and indices of wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The named zinc spray schedule increased effective tillers, grain weight and yield over other treatments.

Treatment
0.5% Zn-EDTA spray at Z45e0
Outcome
effective tillers, 1, 000-grain weight, yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen scheduling (50% RDN at sowing + 50% RDN at Z20) and zinc scheduling (0.5% Zn-EDTA spray at Z45) recorded significantly higher effective tillers, 1, 000-grain weight, yield, zinc uptake, partial factor productivity (PEP), agronomic efficiency (AE) and recovery efficiency (RE) over the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–1071
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122

Title

Phenophase-based nitrogen and zinc scheduling for agronomic zinc biofortification and indices of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Arup Layek; Saroj Kumar Prasad; Manoj Kumar Singh; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2017

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e134ee570cc5b8298a017a792859f9da5072c1d100d678d525d7002fb81747f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.