Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After 8 days of storage, treated strawberries had 52.5% higher VC content than the control

A claim from Preservative effects of clove extract against Alternaria alternata on postharvest strawberries and associated shifts in microbial communities · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 8 days of storage, treated strawberries had 52.5% higher VC content than the control

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
clove extracte3
Outcome
VC contente4
Direction
highere4
Value
52.5%e4
Comparator
controle4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservative effects of clove extract against Alternaria alternata on postharvest strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94
e3

“The MFC of clove extract against A. alternata was 30 mg/mL, which reduced spore survival rate to 40.0% and increased cell membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–862
e4

“After 8 days of storage, the treatment group showed 68.3% higher firmness, 52.5% higher VC content, and 46.4% lower weight loss rate than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1013

Title

Preservative effects of clove extract against Alternaria alternata on postharvest strawberries and associated shifts in microbial communities

Yang Wu; Mingxue Chang; Yihan Liu; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2026. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1736375

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e1441c081ce7b46a84eccf887d3c8051f924af646af5a8a4a27896426f92acad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.