Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn-coated urea gave better grain and stover yields than soil application of Zn sulphate.

A claim from Effect of source and methods of zinc application on corn productivity, nitrogen and zinc concentrations and uptake by high quality protein corn (Zea mays) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-coated urea gave better grain and stover yields than soil application of Zn sulphate.

Treatment
Zn-coated ureae1
Outcome
grain and stover yieldse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
soil application of Zn sulphatee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69
e1

“Application of Zn-coated urea was better than soil application of Zn sulphate with regard to grain and stover yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–425

Title

Effect of source and methods of zinc application on corn productivity, nitrogen and zinc concentrations and uptake by high quality protein corn (Zea mays)

Y Singh Shivay; R Prasad Egyptian Journal of Biology 2014. doi:10.4314/ejb.v16i1.10

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e190d54e5c17d3cebe3eca7ec6b0ab1c32f19b5aecb82a64323db2d39cb1c565 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.