Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flesh browning and volatile concentrations increased with exposure duration, carbon dioxide pressure, and later harvest.

A claim from Fermentative Volatile Production in Relation to Carbon Dioxide-induced Flesh Browning in `Fuji' Apple · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh browning and volatile concentrations increased with exposure duration, carbon dioxide pressure, and later harvest.

Material
Fujie0
Treatment
high CO 2e1
Outcome
Area of flesh browning and concentrations of all compoundse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
20 kPa CO 2e1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple ( Malux × domestica Borkh., cv. Fuji) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49
e1

“Area of flesh browning and concentrations of all compounds increased with increasing duration of exposure to high CO 2 , were greater in response to 50 kPa than to 20 kPa CO 2 , and were greater for fruit harvested later in the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–731

Title

Fermentative Volatile Production in Relation to Carbon Dioxide-induced Flesh Browning in `Fuji' Apple

Richard K. Volz; William V. Biasi; Elizabeth J. Mitcham HortScience 1998. doi:10.21273/hortsci.33.7.1231

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e202071e1b0aa4b246fb34e566237f557ad8c7d0c95c3c2a7be6b29e89104fa6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

co2 · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.