Claim · model-written summary
Pruning shortly after harvest had no significant adverse effect on vine phenology or productivity.
- Treatment
- Pruning shortly after harveste0
- Outcome
- vine phenology or productivitye0
- Direction
- no significant adverse effectse0
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning shortly after harvest caused no significant adverse effects on vine phenology or productivity.”
t0“grapevine”
Title
M.C.T. TROUGHT; J.S. BENNETT; H.L. BOLDINGH Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00141.x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Pruning just before bud break delayed vine development.
- Intervention effect Trunk stored total carbohydrate concentrations were unaffected by pruning time or retained cane number.
- Observation Trunk carbohydrates had accumulated to adequate levels by harvest.
- Mechanism Post-harvest photosynthesis or cane maturation had little effect on subsequent vine growth and development.
- Intervention effect Pruning shortly before bud break delayed bud break.
- Recommendation Pruning immediately after harvest is recommended to extend the pruning period and reduce peak labour demand in cool climates.
- Recommendation Late pruning may provide greater tolerance to late spring frosts.