Paper · 2016 · Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology

Anthocyanin Levels and Expression Analysis of Biosynthesis-related Genes during Ripening of Sicilian and International Grape Berries Subjected to Leaf Removal and Water Deficit

Luca Cicero; Ivana Puglisi; Elisabetta Nicolosi; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The imposition of managed water deficit and early leaf removal are strategies used to improve the grapes quality in terms of anthocyanin content. The aim of our work was to evaluate the change in total anthocyanin levels during the ripening of the Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato) and of the international variety of Cabernet Sauvignon, subjected to two different levels of water deficit, 0% (NI) and 30% (I) of estimated crop evapotranspiration, and subjected to Early Leaf Removal (ELR) or Not (NLR). The expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis, such as Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL) and UDP-glucose-Flavonoid-Glucosyl Transferase (UFGT), was also monitored. Our results indicate that the amount of anthocyanin during the ripening process can be regulated by the application of the aforementioned agronomic practises. The anthocyanin content of Cabernet Sauvignon may be risen either by the simultaneous application of Early Leaf Removal and in water restitution regime (ELR-I) or by the association of water deficit and absence of defoliation (NLR-NI). The analysis of the total content of anthocyanin in Frappato variety has globally revealed that the maximum value in the levels of pigments is reached later than in the other autochthonous Nero d'Avola variety. This finding is of considerable interest since both the harvest time and product processing might be differentiated among varieties. Conversely, the variety Nero d'Avola was not affected by the experimental conditions and showed the highest level of pigments at fully ripe time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic practices regulated anthocyanin amount during grape ripening.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
agronomic practisese0
Outcome
amount of anthocyanine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of anthocyanin during the ripening process can be regulated by the application of the aforementioned agronomic practises.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removal with water restitution may raise Cabernet Sauvignon anthocyanin.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
Early Leaf Removal and in water restitution regime (ELR-I)e0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
risene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The anthocyanin content of Cabernet Sauvignon may be risen either by the simultaneous application of Early Leaf Removal and in water restitution regime (ELR-I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit without defoliation may raise Cabernet Sauvignon anthocyanin.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont1
Treatment
water deficit and absence of defoliation (NLR-NI)e0
Outcome
anthocyanin contentt1
Direction
risent1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“association of water deficit and absence of defoliation (NLR-NI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
t1

“anthocyanin content of Cabernet Sauvignon may be risen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frappato reached peak pigment levels later than Nero d’Avola.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Frappatot1
Outcome
levels of pigmentse0
Direction
later thane0
Comparator
Nero d'Avolae0

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum value in the levels of pigments is reached later than in the other autochthonous Nero d'Avola variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
t1

“Frappato variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nero d’Avola showed its highest pigment level at full ripeness.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Nero d'Avolat1
Organ / stage
fully ripe timee0
Outcome
level of pigmentse0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“showed the highest level of pigments at fully ripe time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sicilian grapes (Nero d'Avola and Frappato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
t1

“the variety Nero d'Avola was not affected by the experimental conditions and showed the highest level of pigments at fully ripe time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1577 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults differ

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.