Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late pruning produced higher grape anthocyanin concentration at similar TSS.

A claim from Effect of delaying winter pruning of Bobal and Tempranillo grapevines on vine performance, grape and wine composition · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late pruning produced higher grape anthocyanin concentration at similar TSS.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
late pruninge0
Outcome
anthocyanin concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
similar TSS at harveste0
Comparator
vines pruned at dormancye1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late pruning delayed grape ripening, resulting in grapes with higher anthocyanin concentration for similar TSS at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–591
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69
e1

“vines pruned at dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–335

Title

Effect of delaying winter pruning of Bobal and Tempranillo grapevines on vine performance, grape and wine composition

I. Buesa; A. Yeves; F. Sanz; et al. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2020. doi:10.1111/ajgw.12467

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e5702547c083fca165647f07709eca12efdaf9f256cb587fc1745e024547d11e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.