Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Modified atmosphere packing with ethylene absorbent normal color and flavor.

A claim from Effect of Modified Atmosphere Bag Treatment on Post-harvest Physiology,Biochemistry and Quality in Banana · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified atmosphere packing with ethylene absorbent normal color and flavor.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
modified atmosphere bag packing(thickness 0.015 mm) with ethylene absorbente0
Outcome
color and flavore0
Direction
normale0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
25℃e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that,the treatment of modified atmosphere bag packing(thickness 0.015 mm) with ethylene absorbent,at the temperature of 25℃ was the best one with the least rotten rates,normal color and flavor.Compared with control,it could delay fruit softening,inhibit cell permeability and POD activity.It could also reduce increasing rate of ethylene and respiration rate,and then increase the fruit life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–558
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105

Title

Effect of Modified Atmosphere Bag Treatment on Post-harvest Physiology,Biochemistry and Quality in Banana

Qingxi Chen Fujian Fruits 2010

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e2400fe3237cb7cb9fe6e138bb746f5afb2720fc767225867d34a8aa4e3e60a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

ethene · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

82 papers: 70 positive, 12 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.