Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was excelled under the mycorrhizal inoculation treatment (Myco) compared with the control without biofertilizer.

A claim from Efficiency of Gibberellic Acid and some Modern Insecticides in Control Earias Insulana (Bosid) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was excelled under the mycorrhizal inoculation treatment (Myco) compared with the control without biofertilizer.

Treatment
fertilizer treatment (Myco)e5
Interactor
mycorrhizal Me4symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese5
Direction
excellede5
Comparator
control treatment without adding COe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of bio-fertilizer and pesticide spraying on potato yield and its quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–254
e4

“biofertilizer with three levels (control treatment without adding CO, inoculation treatment with rhizobia R, inoculation treatment with mycorrhizal M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–755
e5

“the fertilizer treatment (Myco) and chlorophyll content in leaves were excelled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1230

Title

Efficiency of Gibberellic Acid and some Modern Insecticides in Control Earias Insulana (Bosid)

Elaf Hassan Ali Jarmat; Sabiha Hassoun Kazem IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1262/3/032057

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e28a864c6482bca14d145e102172ffc8de886a977cc54a5c45b0c59dc357275f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.