Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect soybean and wheat yields.

A claim from Short-term Tillage and Fertilization Impacts on Soil Organic Carbon, Aggregate Stability and Yield of Soybean-Wheat System in Deep Black Soils of Central India · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect soybean and wheat yields.

Taxon
soybean and wheat cropsGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not show significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tillage treatments did not show significant effect on yield of both the soybean and wheat crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2065

Title

Short-term Tillage and Fertilization Impacts on Soil Organic Carbon, Aggregate Stability and Yield of Soybean-Wheat System in Deep Black Soils of Central India

K. M. Hati; R. S. Chaudhary; M. Mohanty; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2014

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e29b4765357fc04e7066b60447af46a0e224102baf353ca3ea46ad1ab71473d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.