Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Microbiological fertilisers significantly increased vitamin C concentration in Gaugin grown in winter and spring.

A claim from The productivity and quality of Lactuca sativa as influenced by microbiological fertilisers and seasonal conditions · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbiological fertilisers significantly increased vitamin C concentration in Gaugin grown in winter and spring.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Material
Gaugine2
Treatment
Microbiological fertiliserse2
Outcome
concentration of vitamin Ce2
Direction
highere2
Setting
winter and springe2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46
e2

“Microbiological fertilisers contributed to significantly higher concentration of vitamin C in the 'Gaugin' and 'Carmesi' grown in winter and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1935

Title

The productivity and quality of Lactuca sativa as influenced by microbiological fertilisers and seasonal conditions

Milica Stojanović; Ivana Petrović; Milena Žuža; et al. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2020. doi:10.13080/z-a.2020.107.044

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e2a18819434d2aa5d805e5470a77833194489f63651bf463a71fb3c4981ab07f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 39 positive, 10 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.