Abstract
The effects of three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers on yield and quality of lettuce were studied. The results showed that compared to the control combining with treatment of humic acid drip irrigation fertilizer(T1), treatment of leaf vegetables solid inorganic drip irrigation fertilizer(T2),treatment of universal solid inorganic drip irrigation fertilizer(T3), three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers could significantly increase plant height, plant expansion, leaf number of lettuce. Lettuce yields were found increased 34.9%, 11.8% and 31.3% respectively. Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers significantly increased soluble sugar content of lettuce,decreased nitrate content,and there were no significant differences in vitamin C content. Among three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers,humic acid drip irigation fertilizer(T1)was the best, which obviously enhanced the growth for lettuce,increased yield, improved quality of lettuce.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
All three fertilizers significantly increased lettuce height, expansion and leaf number relative to control.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- plant height, plant expansion, leaf numbere0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers could significantly increase plant height, plant expansion, leaf number of lettuce.”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid fertilizer increased lettuce yield by 34.9%.
- Taxon
- LettuceLactuca sativae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 34.9%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lettuce yields were found increased 34.9%, 11.8% and 31.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf-vegetable solid inorganic fertilizer increased lettuce yield by 11.8%.
- Taxon
- LettuceLactuca sativae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11.8%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lettuce yields were found increased 34.9%, 11.8% and 31.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Universal solid inorganic fertilizer increased lettuce yield by 31.3%.
- Taxon
- LettuceLactuca sativae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.3%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lettuce yields were found increased 34.9%, 11.8% and 31.3% respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
All three fertilizers significantly increased lettuce soluble sugar content.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers significantly increased soluble sugar content of lettuce,decreased nitrate content,and there were no significant differences in vitamin C content.”
Claim · model-written summary
All three fertilizers decreased lettuce nitrate content.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- nitrate contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers significantly increased soluble sugar content of lettuce,decreased nitrate content,and there were no significant differences in vitamin C content.”
Claim · model-written summary
Vitamin C content did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- vitamin C contente0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three drip irrigation special purpose fertilizers significantly increased soluble sugar content of lettuce,decreased nitrate content,and there were no significant differences in vitamin C content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors considered humic acid fertilizer the best for lettuce growth, yield and quality.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- humic acid drip irigation fertilizer(T1)e0
- Outcome
- growth for lettuce,increased yield, improved quality of lettucee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“humic acid drip irigation fertilizer(T1)was the best, which obviously enhanced the growth for lettuce,increased yield, improved quality of lettuce.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →irrigation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
244 papers more in this group
See all 248 papers →irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.