Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation water cadmium did not significantly change nutrient element absorption except Fe.

A claim from Response of lettuce to Cd-enriched water and irrigation frequencies · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water cadmium did not significantly change nutrient element absorption except Fe.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
cadmium in irrigation watere0
Outcome
absorption of nutrient elements by plantse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
except for Fee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of cadmium in irrigation water did not significantly affect the absorption of nutrient elements by plants except for Fe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–714
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19

Title

Response of lettuce to Cd-enriched water and irrigation frequencies

A. Azizian; S. Amin; M. Maftoun; et al. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2011. doi:10.5897/ajest11.186

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5db867f85dbdd83e0e3c65f72c2bc23beb80cedfd5b4c44c3e77ecd7e0630bde · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.