Paper · 2022 · Water

Fate of Soil Residual Fertilizer-15N as Affected by Different Drip Irrigation Regimes

Jingnan Chen; Qiu Jin; Qinyuan Zhu; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil residual N is a potential factor threatening the environment, but it is also an N fertilizer resource. Few studies have evaluated the fate of soil residual N under agronomic practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of residual N and its possible influencing factors with different irrigation regimes. Under three N residual situations created by the previous season using the 15N labeled urea, we employed lettuce as the plant material and three lower limits of drip irrigation including 75% (DR1), 65% (DR2), and 55% (DR3) accounting for the field water capacity as experimental treatments. A furrow irrigation treatment (FI) with the same irrigation regime as DR2 was used as control. Results showed that 2.1–4.8% of the residual 15N from the previous season was absorbed by the succeeding lettuce, 78.0–84.4% was still remained in the 0–80 cm soil, and 10.9–20.0% was unaccounted for. After harvest of succeeding lettuces, the soil residual 15N mainly existed in the mineral form. Moreover, the lettuce reuse efficiency for15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount (p < 0.01) and the mineral 15N amount (p < 0.01). The overall results indicated that an appropriate irrigation regime (DR2) was conducive to promoting absorption of residual N by succeeding crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 2.1–4.8% of the residual 15N from the previous season was absorbed by the succeeding lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
absorbed by the succeeding lettucee1
Value
2.1–4.8%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we employed lettuce as the plant material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“2.1–4.8% of the residual 15N from the previous season was absorbed by the succeeding lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 78.0–84.4% of the residual 15N remained in the 0–80 cm soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
still remained in the 0–80 cm soile2
Value
78.0–84.4%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we employed lettuce as the plant material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“78.0–84.4% was still remained in the 0–80 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 10.9–20.0% of the residual 15N was unaccounted for.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
unaccounted fore3
Value
10.9–20.0%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we employed lettuce as the plant material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“10.9–20.0% was unaccounted for”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–924 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After harvest of the succeeding lettuce, soil residual 15N existed mainly in mineral form.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae4
Outcome
soil residual 15Ne4
Qualifier
mainly existed in the mineral forme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“After harvest of succeeding lettuces, the soil residual 15N mainly existed in the mineral form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1020 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce reuse efficiency for 15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae5
Compound
total residual 15N amounte5
Outcome
lettuce reuse efficiency for15Ne5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the lettuce reuse efficiency for15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount (p < 0.01) and the mineral 15N amount (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce reuse efficiency for 15N was positively correlated with the mineral 15N amount.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae5
Compound
mineral 15N amounte5
Outcome
lettuce reuse efficiency for15Ne5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the lettuce reuse efficiency for15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount (p < 0.01) and the mineral 15N amount (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An appropriate irrigation regime (DR2) promoted absorption of residual N by the succeeding lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
irrigation regime (DR2)e7
Outcome
absorption of residual N by succeeding crope7
Direction
promotinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we employed lettuce as the plant material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–473 · show in text ↑
e7

“The overall results indicated that an appropriate irrigation regime (DR2) was conducive to promoting absorption of residual N by succeeding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1323 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.