Paper · 2019 · Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Crops

Water and Nitrogen use Efficiency of Lettuce under Water Stressed Growing Conditions

Ansari M.; Chaichi M. R.; Bhandari S.; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lettuce as an important vegetable crop warrants special research and attention. Because of environmental and economic concerns, it is necessary to determine the most efficient application levels of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer to achieve the optimum yield in this crop. Two field experiments were conducted to test the effect of deficit irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer applications on agronomic growth characteristics of lettuce. Experimental treatments were arranged in split strip plots based on a completely randomized block design with three replications. The irrigation and nitrogen treatments were considered at four levels (0, 25, 50, and 100% of the currently recommended water and N fertilizer for lettuce production). Results showed that 50% of irrigation water and 25% of nitrogen (IR50N25) treatment currently recommended for lettuce production led to significantly higher water (4.4 Kg DM/m3) and N (45 kg DM/kg N) use efficiencies for the fall experiment in 2017. The same results for water of 3.9 kg DM/m3 and N of 73.1 kg DM/kg were achieved in the spring experiment 2018. The optimum lettuce biomass yield was obtained for IR50N25 treatment in both experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IR50N25 gave significantly higher fall 2017 water use efficiency of 4.4 Kg DM/m3.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
50% of irrigation water and 25% of nitrogen (IR50N25)e0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.4 Kg DM/m3e0
Setting
fall experiment in 2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% of irrigation water and 25% of nitrogen (IR50N25) treatment currently recommended for lettuce production led to significantly higher water (4.4 Kg DM/m3) and N (45 kg DM/kg N) use efficiencies for the fall experiment in 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IR50N25 gave significantly higher fall 2017 nitrogen use efficiency of 45 kg DM/kg N.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
50% of irrigation water and 25% of nitrogen (IR50N25)e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
45 kg DM/kg Ne0
Setting
fall experiment in 2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% of irrigation water and 25% of nitrogen (IR50N25) treatment currently recommended for lettuce production led to significantly higher water (4.4 Kg DM/m3) and N (45 kg DM/kg N) use efficiencies for the fall experiment in 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring 2018 water use efficiency under the same treatment was 3.9 kg DM/m3.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
watere0
Value
3.9 kg DM/m3e0
Setting
spring experiment 2018e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same results for water of 3.9 kg DM/m3 and N of 73.1 kg DM/kg were achieved in the spring experiment 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring 2018 nitrogen use efficiency under the same treatment was 73.1 kg DM/kg.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
73.1 kg DM/kge0
Setting
spring experiment 2018e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same results for water of 3.9 kg DM/m3 and N of 73.1 kg DM/kg were achieved in the spring experiment 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR50N25 yielded optimum lettuce biomass in both experiments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
IR50N25e0
Outcome
lettuce biomass yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Qualifier
both experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum lettuce biomass yield was obtained for IR50N25 treatment in both experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1193 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 35 positive, 17 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.