Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The antagonist reduced conidial germination at low apple juice concentrations but not at 5%.

A claim from Biocontrol of blue mold on apple fruits by Aureobasidium pullulans (strain Ach 1-1): in vitro and in situ evidence for the possible involvement of competition for nutrients. · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist reduced conidial germination at low apple juice concentrations but not at 5%.

Taxon
apple fruitsMalus domesticat0
Treatment
presence of the antagoniste0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume1pathogen
Second interactor
Ach1-1e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germination of conidiae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
low (0.1, 0.5 and 1%)e0
Comparator
high (5%) juice concentrationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of the antagonist greatly reduced germination of conidia at low (0.1, 0.5 and 1%) but not at high (5%) juice concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–589
t0

“apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39
e1

“strain Ach1-1 and P. expansum were cocultured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–350

Title

Biocontrol of blue mold on apple fruits by Aureobasidium pullulans (strain Ach 1-1): in vitro and in situ evidence for the possible involvement of competition for nutrients.

S Krimi Bencheqroun; M Bajji; S Massart; et al. PubMed 2006

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e2aac3f9b8af6c5b35c333eb2ae9e17c2b46bf0923b1c49b932ccb841bf4a3c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.