Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil fumigation had negligible growth effect.

A claim from Resistant Rootstocks, Preplant Compost Amendments, Soil Fumigation, and Row Repositioning for Managing Apple Replant Disease · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation had negligible growth effect.

Treatment
preplant soil fumigatione0
Outcome
Growth responsese0
Direction
negligiblee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108
e0

“Growth responses to preplant soil fumigation were negligible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1422

Title

Resistant Rootstocks, Preplant Compost Amendments, Soil Fumigation, and Row Repositioning for Managing Apple Replant Disease

Michelle M. Leinfelder; Ian A. Merwin; Gennaro Fazio; et al. HortScience 2004. doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.4.841b

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e2dfa4645b2163bec60c802dd90c5e2f64bf19a68ed971f1eb248330ae0ff8ff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

solarization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.